![]() Long, A.A., Sedley, D.N.: The Hellenistic Philosophers. Kneale W., Kneale M.: The Development of Logic. (ed) The Cambridge Companion to Ockham, pp. Klima, G.: Ockham’s Semantics and Ontology of The Categories. 163–178, Leuven UP/ The Hague Martinus Nijhoff, Leuven/The Hague (1974) Proceedings of The International Conference, pp. Jolivet, J.: Comparaison des théories du langage chez Abélard et chez les nominalistes du XIV e siècle. Jolivet, J.: Arts du langage et théologie chez Abélard, Librairie philosophique J. Éditions Du Cerf/Éditions universitaires Fribourg, Paris/Fribourg (1994) Jolivet, J.: Abélard ou la philosophie dans le langage. Hamelin, G.: Influência estóica na concepção de status e dictum propositionis como quasi res em Abelard. Gaffiot, F.: Dictionnaire illustré Latin Français. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland (1970) Cambridge UP, Cambridge (1999)ĭe Rijk, L.M.: Peter Abelard’s Semantics and his Doctrine of Being. Teubneri, Leipzig (1877)Ĭhalmers, D.: Is There Synonymy in Ockham’s Mental Language? In: Spade, P.V. 310–327, Cambridge UP, Cambridge (2003)īoethius, S.: Commentarii in librum Aristotelis. (ed) The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, pp. William Heinemann LTD/Cambridge-Havard UP, London (1938)īlank, D., Atherton, C.: The Stoic Contribution to Traditional Grammar. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1987)Īristotle: The Organon. The ultimate objective is to compare their respective semantic positions and indicate the principal points of agreement and disagreement, keeping in mind the hypothesis according to which these two medieval nominalists should have more theoretical elements in common than not.Īdams, M.M.: William Ockham. In the present article, the chief intention is to expound the theory of sign and signification of each of the authors under consideration. Ockham seems to distance himself definitely from his predecessors, including Abelard, when he transfers grammar and semantic functions of conventional language to the level of mental language. Nevertheless the nominalism of each of these two protagonists apparently diverges in a significant manner, especially in respect to the role exercised by the mind in the semantic process. The repercussions of nominalism are quite evident in relation to the question of universals, which constitutes a subject that, until now, won the attention of the majority of contemporary studies on the two most important logicians of their time. ![]() Both share the fundamental thesis of that doctrine, according to which only individual entities exist. Peter Abelard and William of Ockham represent the two main figures of the nominalism of the Middle Ages. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |